In 1960, Louis Leaky sent a secretary with no college education into the Africa bush to study chimpanzees. Despite the objections of "experts" Leaky persevered. Leaky felt that someone with little formal training would be more likely to describe what they were seeing rather than what they thought they should be seeing.
I think everyone will agree that hiring Jane Goodall for the job was a brilliant move.
Keep Jane Goodall in mind while you watch this video, The Trouble With Experts, then continue reading.
bull advocates make a lot of noise about their "experts" and tout the
perceived consensus among "experts" as proof that "pit bulls" are not
the problem, owners are. Here are four of the more impressively
PETER L. BORCHELT
cited BORCHELT in their anti-BSL position statement and BORCHELT was
called upon to provide his "expert" opinion in favor of pit bulls when a
NYC council member sought to ban them:
Brooklyn-based animal behaviorist who opposes a citywide pit bull ban,
Peter Borchelt, said strong dogs such as pit bulls, Rottweilers and
German shepherds are generally safe, if they are "raised like pets." You
get into trouble when the dog is not trained to be nonaggressive," Mr.
Borchelt, who has a doctorate in animal behavior, said. "They can become
dangerous when they're thrown behind a fence and allowed to become
overly protective. You just have to take a few extra steps to make sure
the dog is friendly, affectionate, and well socialized."
PETER L. BORCHELT, PhD and "expert" for hire.
BORCHELT provided the above "expert" opinion about the safety of pit bulls AFTER he was sued for a million dollars
for providing his "expert" opinion to a retired fire fighter about the
safety of a pit bull that he was in possession of. The pit bull attacked
the retired fire fighter. Despite the fact that the pit bull had a
known documented history of previous aggression, BORCHELT assured the
retired fire fighter the pit bull was safe. During the civil trial,
BORCHELT testified under oath that the pit bull was not vicious. Yeah.
Just in case you missed the colored text above indicating an external
link, click here.
PETER BORCHELT is a member of an elite club known as Certified Applied Animal Behaviorists. According to the civil lawsuit article, he charges $300 an hour to fix your dog's problems. You can find his fee schedule here. BORCHELT'S gun for hire, er uh I mean "expert" witness page is conveniently malfunctioning.
I were asked to recommend a dog, say for a children's psychiatric ward,
my first choice would be a pit bull. When children pull their tail, if
they have one, or poke them, the dog's like... he doesn't care. With a
good owner, you have the most fantastic breed of all.
IAN DUNBAR, DVM, PhD
Poor Ian. Yet another dupe of proof of assertion. Apparently he has yet to receive the memo regarding the official revocation of nanny dog status.
Hot shot Dunbar does not appear to offer services for problematic or dangerous behaviors. Smart move.
other breed has been maligned or vilified as much as the pit bull
terrier. One commonly finds negative publicity about this breed, despite
the fact that many honorable Americans have kept pit bulls as pets,
including Franklin Roosevelt and Thomas Edison.
RICHARD POLSKY, PhD and "expert" for hire.
Richard. All of that money and all those years spent studying to
acquire impressive degrees was no guarantee that he would be able to
demonstrate critical thinking skills. He still fell prey to the common
fallacy known as Proof of Assertion.
It is a documented fact that President Roosevelt's "pit bull" was a
dangerous menace. It is a documented fact that Edison did not own Nipper
and there is no documented proof that Thomas Edison ever owned any pit
The pit bulldog's long legacy of vilification is well earned and well documented.
POLSKY'S fee schedule is available on demand. I suspect it is one of those cases where if you have to ask, you probably can't afford it.
DR JAMES HA, animal behaviorist at the University of Washington in Seattle and "expert" for hire.
reason we're focusing just on pit bulls is that we hear so much about
them, and that is not because of the breed difference, the genetic
difference - that's because of the way they've been raised.
quote is from a 2010 KOMO news interview. Compare that to HA'S blog
post in 2008, where HA cited research that stated red and golden cocker
spaniels were more likely to display aggressive behavior than black
cocker spaniels and that yellow labs were "significantly more
likely to be reported with aggression problems" than the black or
chocolate variants, yet JAMES HA promotes the crazy notion that dogs
artificially selected for violence only require a loving gentle family.
in the 2010 KOMO interview, DR HA stated that mastiffs, chows,
shepherds, rottweillers and dobermans are "all more genetically
aggressive than" dogs that had been artificially selected for combat for
200 years. HA goes on to add that genetics is roughly 20-30%
responsible for temperament. YET, at the roughly 4:00 minute mark of his
presentation on "Behavioral Genetics" DR HA stated that in studies of
selected dog breeds, none were gripping breeds btw, for defence
behaviors ie, guarding, attacking, biting there is a 14 - 20%
heritability rate "which in genetics world is important". He immediately
followed up with "there are different genetic predispositions in
different breeds." Towards the end of this 2011 youtube video, HA states that 30-50% of behavior is genetics. My head was spinning just trying to keep up with all his facts.
DR JAMES HA is a member of an elite club known as Certified Applied Animal Behaviorists.
HA offers a variety of services ranging from $75 - 250 plus travel fees.
unspoken assumption among early behavior geneticists, an assumption
that was shared by most for many years, was that some psychological
traits were likely to be significantly influenced by genetic factors,
whereas others were likely to be primarily influenced by shared
environmental influences. Most behavior geneticists assumed that social
attitudes, for example, were influenced entirely by shared environmental
influences, and so social attitudes remained largely unstudied until
relatively recently. The evidence now shows how wrong these assumptions
were. Nearly every reliably measured psychological phenotype (normal and
abnormal) is significantly influenced by genetic factors.
Heritabilities also differ far less from trait to trait than anyone
initially imagined. Shared environmental influences are often, but not
always, of less importance than genetic factors, and often decrease to
near zero after adolescence. Genetic influence on psychological
traits is ubiquitous, and psychological researchers must incorporate
this fact into their research programs else their theories will be
‘‘scientifically unimpressive and technologically worthless,’’ to quote Meehl again.
Genetic Influence on Human Psychological Traits
Genetics, Not Parenting, Key to Temperament, Studies Say, Los Angeles Times, February 20, 1994
Major Personality Study Finds That Traits Are Mostly Inherited, New York Times, December 2, 1986
BORCHELT, IAN DUNBAR, RICHARD POLSKY and JAMES HA believe that purpose
bred dogs, artificially selected for violent combat for 200 years are
not genetically predisposed to violence. BORCHELT, DUNBAR, POLSKY and HA
believe it is equally wrong to think that nature plays second fiddle to
nurture in dogs. Unfortunately, they have been able to convince others
of their distorted beliefs too.
So much for "experts".
Dr James Ha
The Nanny Dog Myth Revealed
Thomas Edison's pit bull
Famous Pit Bull Owners: The Thomas Alva Edison Edition
Famous Pit Bull Owners: The Presidential Edition
Pete Roosevelt: The Disgraced White House Bandog
Myth 99: Scientists know what they are talking about because they study animals in an objective way, Alexandra Semyonova
The science of how behavior is inherited in aggressive dogs by Alexandra Semyonova
Alexandra Semyonova's book, The 100 Silliest Things People Say About Dogs is available in the right side bar of this blog.
The Trouble With Experts
Only An Expert